Ten years ago, James Adams, MD, kicked off a conference aimed at pinning down elusive quality-of-care measures in emergency medicine by challenging the longstanding assumption that such a task couldn’t be done. A short time later, in a special issue of Academic Emergency Medicine, “Assuring Quality in Emergency Care,” he predicted a future of metrics, noting that the very idea might cause “frustration, resentment and opposition,” but also could lead t0 “problem-solving, creativity and success.” (2011;17[8].)
The article, also authored by Michelle Biros, MD, forecast a time when the notion wouldn’t seem radical but rather an essential focus of ED operations. (Acad Emerg Med 2002;9[11]:1067.) It looks like that day has arrived.
Three efforts in the past year, one led by the Intermountain Institute for Health Care Delivery Research, another by the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), and a third by Urgent Matters sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, offer a prescriptive means for assessing quality of care in emergency medicine, suggesting how it can be quantified and offering ways in which it can be more precisely defined. Read more






